Analysis Of Upton Sinclair s The Grapes Of Wrath

Contemporary society deems social class a division within a given population defined by wealth, education, and power, but the lines that divide them unceasingly deepen. Social mobility, or the movement of an individual between the stratification of societal classes, remains virtually illusory, an unattainable falsity that millions have laboriously fought for since the turn of the twentieth century. Monopolies and wage slavery remain definite and palpable, both of which contribute to immobility between social rankings, establishing an unbreakable cycle of poverty. The idyllic ethos of the American Dream, a belief that one will achieve success through hard work and opportunity, prove to be a fallacious, hollow and vague ambition that cannot be attained. Paradigms that exploit the plight of the â€Å"American worker† beginning in the early nineteen hundreds include muckraker Upton Sinclair’s The Jungle and John Steinbeck’s The Grapes of Wrath. The quandaries that pl ague the characters of the aforementioned novels parallel that of modern day exposà ©s, such as Class Matters, by Bill Keller, Nickel and Dimed, by Barbara Ehrenreich, and Fast Food Nation, by Eric Schlosser, all of which harness and expose the falsehood of The American Dream as a result of wage slavery, class separation, and monopolization of major industries. The delineations that exist between the lower and upper class render the American Dream an empty, intangible delusion, unattainable to those enslaved by low wages

Domestication Of The Dog Essay Example For Students

Domestication Of The Dog Essay Todays dogs serve as a number of different tools. We train dogs to see for the blind, we train them to sniff for drugs, we train them to save peoples lives, and we train them to be our faithful companions. There is no doubt that the dog has a wide variety of skills and jobs. We selectively breed the dog to gain the certain attributes we are seeking, and we know which dogs will perform the best at what we want them to do. The question is how long ago, and why did the dog become our aids, tools, and companions? Answering this question means dealing with the four fields of Anthropology: Ethnologically, Archaeologically, Physically, and Linguistically. The most obvious way to learn about the past of the dog species, is to treat it the same way we treat ancient societies. Archaeologists study where they once were, look at their remains. Where they lived, what they looked like, and how they changed over time. An example of using the Archaeological field of Anthropology would be the excavation of the Roman city, Pompeii, which was destroyed by the volcano Vesuvius in AD 79. When finally excavated, searchers found the remains of a dog lying across a child, apparently trying to protect him. By looking at this individual skeleton, we can estimate that just 1900 years ago, the inhabitants knew of the dogs desire to protect. They probably counted on dogs similarly to the way we do today. Other archaeological digs have suggested that the relationship between dogs and humans dates to about 14,000 years ago. Most experts do agree the dog was the first domesticated animal, was domesticated around 14 to 15,000 years ago. The earliest bones of d ogs that we have recovered come from a site called ein Mallaha in Israel. This site was discovered in 1979 and the bones date back to 12,000 years old but historians believe the dog had been domesticated even a few thousand years before that. Another field of Anthropology is the Ethnological aspect of the science. From looking back at the ancient civilizations customs and beliefs, we can see relationships between their stories and how they lived. This also ties into the linguistic field of Anthropology, where the culture is passed on to the children through stories and myths. An example of this would be the following: historians have studied the Roman myths and legends that were popular in ancient Rome, and they agree that the Ancient Romans relied heavily on watchdogs for protection. The Romans apparently derived this tradition from the legend that a dog guarded the gate to hell. Therefore, they used dogs to protect what was dear to them, homes, valuables, and families. Romans also used dogs for military purposes, some as attack dogs, and some as messengers. They equipped their Mastiffs with light armor and sent them into battle against the enemy, carrying spikes and cauldrons of flaming sulphur (Whitehead 242). These do gs were obviously essential to the ancient Romans lives. The last field of Anthropology that has not been discussed is the physical field. By looking at a culmination of the fossils we have, it not only adds to a holistic approach to the problem, but it also gives us a longitudinal study of a very old question. Instead of gathering the information over multiple visits, which would be impossible, we can get the same information we need by looking at the same object, at different points of history. To do this, we look at fossilized remains that we are able to date. By doing this, we can track the changes we notice. For example, it is quite obvious; that the first domesticated dogs were not as diverse as the dogs we have today. There were only a few kinds of dogs. Fossil remains of the early Bronze Age, 6500 years ago; make it possible to identify 5 major groups of early dogs. As the fossils get younger and younger, we notice a growing of the species. Dogs are obviously mixing and creating new breeds. The wide diversity in breeds that we witn ess today comes from selective breeding as well as natural genetic mutations in the five groups. Physical Anthropology even explores this last point. These natural genetic mutations are causing some dissention in the professional field. A recent study, led by biologist Robert K. Wayne of UCLA, suggests that canines may have been domesticated 100,000 or more years ago, only 30,000 years after the first signs of modern humans. These genetic mutations serve as a harmless ?genetic clock? that indicate the passage of time in the evolution of the wolf to the dog. This same method has been used to show that humans diverged from a common ancestor in North Africa and to show when Asians first entered North America and established Native American populations. Although this idea seems quite rational, most historians will not accept this as fact. The fossils seem to be a much more widely accepted view. People will always accept something they can physically see, rather than theorems and estimat ions. So, as one can see, by using these four fields simultaneously, in a holistic method, Anthropologists can paint a very convincing portrait of a question that seems impossible to answer unless someone was there to witness it. Often, these answers can solve very important questions that provide explanations to why we live the way we do today. Although it is not imperative that we know when and why the wolf became the dog we know today, it is interesting to study the people who helped give us what we know now as mans best companion and protection. If Anthropology can solve this Anthropological problem, it is exciting to think what else we can learn about another group of people or time period, without even being present!Bibliography? Whitehead, Sarah. Dog, The Complete Guide. London: Team Media, Ltd.,1999? Friend, Tim ?Dog domestication dates to early man.? USA Today, 10/23/97. (2 October 2000)? Dansie, Amy ?Mans Oldest Best Friends: Ancient Dogs in Nevada.? Nevada State Museum N ewsletter, May/June 1999. (2 October 2000)

Research Proposal of the Decline of Manufacturing Jobs in the United States Steel Industry Essay Example

Research Proposal of the Decline of Manufacturing Jobs in the United States Steel Industry Essay Introduction Throughout the 20th century, the United States steel industry underwent major changes, which affected the structure of the industry, its major companies and the number of jobs in the steel industry. There is no secret that the number of manufacturing jobs in the U.S. steel industry has significantly decreased and will probably continue to fall due to several reasons. The United States steel industry entered the period of crises in the late 1950s, which intensively remained until the late 1960s despite the fact that specific measures are taken. Scientific research proves that the decline of the steel industry, which also resulted in the decline of the number of jobs in the steel industry, was caused by the combination of reasons. However, it is also proved the major reason was international trade, or to be exact, the increasing amount of imports. Consequences of the cut down of manufacturing jobs in the steel industry have affected a lot of communities significantly across the country , and especially, Eastern and Midwestern regions of the country, where the majority of steel mills were situated many years ago and continue to be there nowadays. Being a part of deindustrialization process decline of the number of jobs in the U.S. steel industry has negatively affected people, who were laid off their jobs as a result of cut down. Steel mills around which small towns have been built started to close, leaving now opportunities for future well-being for their former employees. Those who did not lose their jobs did not have even the smallest ray of hope and faith that they would not be laid off in the nearest future because the loss of money and the decline of competitive ability of steel mills were evident to everybody. The primary goal of designing current study is to discover and analyze significant reasons, which caused a decline in manufacturing jobs in the United States steel industry. The paper will focus on the historical facts leading up to these reasons as well as consequences of the decrease in the number of jobs. The state of the modern steel industry in the USA will also be described further in the study. 1. Historical Background When the steel industry faced the crisis in 1977-1978, it wasn’t something new and unknown, because the industry had already had problems and hard times starting at the end of the 1950s due to the increase of imports. The state of the steel industry at that time was characterized by prolonged growth, which was even worsened by the rising of imports, lowering profits and constant misunderstandings with the USA government on the matter of pricing policies. By the end of the 1960s, the problem with import became so acute that the leaders in the steel industry had no other choice but to refer to the government, which they tried to persuade to â€Å"negotiate import restrictions with Japanese and European exporters of steel† [3]. Having acknowledged the necessity to protect domestic producers of steel, the government prepared a so-called â€Å"protectionist legislation† aiming at eliminating the amount of imported steel into the country. However, taken measures seemed not to be working. Despite the fact that the year of 1974 was rather successful for the steel industry, it was followed by the significant recession in 1975, which â€Å"plunged the industry back into a depressed state – a condition from which it has not recovered† [3]. What caused the recession? The author of the book â€Å"The U.S. Steel Industry in Recurrent Crisis: Policy Options in a Competitive World† Robert W. Crandall names several reasons, including the â€Å"increase of the environmental costs† and the â€Å"labor costs† [3]. As a result of the increase of imports and the failure of the government to control it, a lot of steel mills had either to close down or to decrease the number of workers. The ones that chose to close turned into places like Youngstown, which became â€Å"a place of naked ruins, junk heaps of indiscernible provenance or pint-sized industrial follow-ons, including a few steel processing plants and one â€Å"mini-mi ll,† which doesn’t make steel but simply melts scrap metal into reusable form† [10]. According to statistical evidence, about 10,000 people were employed there â€Å"before first one; then another big steel company shut down until US Steel struck the final blow in 1979† [10]. In 2002, the mini-mill which still exists and operates in that area employed only â€Å"about 430† workers [10]. Examples of the shutting down of mills and employees dismissal are multiple. At the beginning of the 1980s, the community was shocked when â€Å"U.S. Steel added to the record-breaking chill by announcing it would permanently lay off 15,400 workers and close part or all of twenty-nine mills, the largest shutdown in American history† [1]. 2. Significant Reasons Causing the Decline of Manufacturing Jobs in the United States Steel Industry We will write a custom essay sample on Research Proposal of the Decline of Manufacturing Jobs in the United States Steel Industry specifically for you for only $16.38 $13.9/page Order now We will write a custom essay sample on Research Proposal of the Decline of Manufacturing Jobs in the United States Steel Industry specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer We will write a custom essay sample on Research Proposal of the Decline of Manufacturing Jobs in the United States Steel Industry specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer Having spoken about critical historical facts concerning the decline of manufacturing jobs in the U.S. steel industry, it is necessary to examine major reasons that influenced the decline. The first reason is the decision of U.S. government to seize some of the steel mills in the USA at the beginning of the 1950s. This happened on the 8th of April, 1952, when â€Å"President Harry S. Truman announced that, to avert a strike, the federal government was seizing the steel mills of all the major companies involved in a labor dispute with the United Steelworkers of America† [7]. It is not necessarily the most important reason, because other reasons seem to have even more influence on the steel industry of the USA, however, the actions of the President provoked much discontent and irritation, because before that nobody has â€Å"taken over the major portion of an industry as basic to the American economy as steel† [7]. It marked the beginning of crisis not only for the steel industry, but also it resulted in a political and constitutional crisis for the whole country, or in a so-called â€Å"war power between Congress and the President† [4]. The second reason consists of two interrelated reasons, which have impacted the US steel industry the most and have resulted in the significant cut downs of jobs all over the country. These two reasons include the growth of imports and U.S. government’s failure to control it. The steel industry had faced a lot of problems before; however, the real crisis began in 1977. In the middle of 1970s, the industry started its recovery, which was abruptly â€Å"aborted by a sudden surge in imports and the price-cutting associated with this surge† [3]. As a result of the increasing amount of imports several major companies closed, the income of the industry lowered to the â€Å"zero† mark. It became clear that without government’s assistance industry would not be able to survive. The U.S. government understood the importance to design a set of policies â€Å"to ease the pressure on the steel industry and its employees, induce the companies to withdraw or suspend the ir dumping complaints, quiet the congressional proponents of trade protection, and minimize the contribution to domestic inflation, which was rising to 7 percent and beyond† [3]. However, the plan that was proposed by Anthony Solomon to accomplish all of the goals described above did not address the real needs of the industry, which continued to dismiss its workers by closing down more and more mills. Measures that should have been taken by the government at that period had to be stricter, maybe even in the form of protectionism to help the industry face severe competition from cheaper imports. Instead, the plan that was designed aimed at helping the steel industry â€Å"in its struggle with foreign competitors by assuring â€Å"fair† competition and reasonable domestic tax and environmental policies† [3]. Also, it remains unclear why the U.S. government waited for so long to design these policies, which indeed came out only after nearly 20 years from the beginni ng of the steel industry crisis. The help should have been provided earlier. This is how the actions of the government are described in the article by Michael Waller â€Å"U.S. in Steel Trap†: â€Å"The domestic steel industry and other industries vital to U.S. national defense is being killed off by policymakers in Washington who are caught up in a â€Å"free-trade fervor† [9]. And the most awkward consequence of such actions can be seen when the U.S. Army needs the products of the steel industry, and it has to go to the world market to find it. This is how it happened when the U.S. Army found the need for new soldiers’ berets. Instead of buying them from domestic producers, â€Å"it had to go to Communist China to have them made. No U.S. company could produce them to the required quality and specifications† [9]. Some of the scientists tried to explain such a weird behavior of the U.S. government. These explanations can be found in the article â€Å"Of fshoring in the Service Sector: Economic Impact and Policy Issues† by Alan Garner, who states that â€Å"Economic research finds that protectionism is a costly way to preserve U.S. jobs† [5]. Instead, the author is convinced that the better way out is to â€Å"adopt policies that ease the reallocation of labor and capital to industries with stronger competitive positions† [5]. The sequential reason of lack of government regulations to aid the steel industry, which also contributed to the decline of manufacturing jobs in the U.S. steel industry, is the lack of competitive strength of U.S. mills as compared to Chinese and Japanese mills, for example, which at that time produced more qualitative products and at cheaper prices. Of course, having no or negative profits makes the owners of the steel mills lay off the workers because there is no sense in continuing the operation. The following reason which impacted the number of employees in the U.S. steel industry is deindustrialization. The process of deindustrialization has touched all of the world nations. It is characterized by the reduction of the employment in the manufacturing sector and the decrease of the number of people employed in the service sector of the national economy. Some of the scientists state that the decrease of manufacturing jobs in the steel industry is due to the decrease of the industrial capacity of the steel industry, which is partially true; however, it is necessary not to forget about the lack of competitive ability as compared to imports. Factors which contributed to the process of deindustrialization in the USA include: â€Å"a lack of investment in basic production, plant closings and layoffs, and the large negative merchandise trade balance as evidence that the United States is losing its manufacturing base† [6]. People that have been laid off started to shift to the service sector, but those who couldn’t shift had to remain unemployed. The process of deindustrialization does not only mean shifting of the jobs to the service sector. However, it means the decline of the manufacturing industries as a whole, which is followed by the reduction of employment and the decrease of net profits. In conclusion to this point, reasons that contributed to the decline of manufacturing jobs in the United States steel industry include the increase of foreign imports and lack of competitive advantage to resist it; government failure to eliminate the pressure on the U.S. steel industry from the side of foreign producers; deindustrialization and shift of the jobs from industrial sector to service sector of economy; lack of investment in the steel industry; decrease of profits; and bankruptcy of the steel mills. 3. Modern State of the Steel Industry in the USA There is no doubt that the U.S. steel industry will continue to exist and will survive all of the hardships. However, the structure of it is constantly changing, adopting new technologies, changing ownership and adapting to a new competitive environment. It is necessary to acknowledge that â€Å"both changing technology and international competition have contributed to a tougher and more competitive environment for American steelmaking† [2], but the centers of the steel industry are still situated in the eastern parts of the country. For example, Pennsylvania, Ohio and Indiana employ nearly â€Å"44 percent of all steelworkers†. In 2004 employment in the steel industry calculated about â€Å"156,000 wage and salary jobs† [11].The majority of workers are employed by large firms, which can be seen from the following chart. Conclusion Having spoken about the reasons which impacted the number of workers in the U.S. steel industry and contributed to its decline, it is necessary to conclude. As it has been stated above, the process of deindustrialization has been a characteristic feature peculiar to all countries all over the world. And the USA is not an exception at this point. However, not only deindustrialization contributed to the decline of manufacturing jobs in the U.S. steel industry. The U.S. government could have taken more effective measures to protect the steel industry from foreign competition; however, it failed to do it. Besides, the development of modern technologies allowed the industry to reduce the number of jobs by adopting new technologies requiring the minimum of human interference. Also, lack of competitiveness and investment in the sector have made it less profitable leaving the owners of the steel companies no other choice as to reduce the number of steelworkers. BibliographyAdelman, L., Daressa, L., Schmiechen, B. (1984). Steelworker Revival: Waking from the American Dream. The Nation, Vol. 238, March 3.Cooney, S. (2003). The American Steel Industry: A Changing Profile. Retrieved March 1, 2007 from www.house.gov/english/pdf/steel.pdfCrandall, R.W. (1981). The U.S. Steel Industry in Recurrent Crisis: Policy Options in a Competitive World. The Brookings Institution.Devins, N., Fisher, L. (2002). The Steel Seizure Case: One of a Kind? Constitutional Commentary, Vol. 19.Garner, A. (2004). Offshoring in the Service Sector: Economic Impact and Policy Issues. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City – Economic Review.Kutscher, R.E., Personick, V.A. (1986). Deindustrialization and the Shift to Services. Monthly Labor Review, Vol. 109.Marcus, M. (1994). Truman and the Steel Seizure Case: The Limits of Presidential Power. Duke University Press.Treado, C.D. (2005). The Pittsburgh Cluster Of Suppliers To The Steel Industry: A Cluster Under A Bushel Ba sket. Retrieved March 1, 2007 from www.industrystudies.pitt.edu/papers/cluster-bushelbasket.pdfWaller, M.J. (2001). U.S. in Steel Trap Magazine article by J. Michael Waller; Insight on the News, Vol. 17, September 17.Wypijewski, J. (2002). Whose Steel? Dead Ends, New Beginnings – the Industry’s 25-Year Crisis. How Can It Be Saved? The Nation, Vol. 275, July 15.Steel Manufacturing. Bureau of Labor Statistics, U.S. Department of Labor. Retrieved March 1, 2007 from http://www.bls.gov/oco/cg/cgs014.htm At EssayLib.com writing service you can order a custom research proposal on any related topics. Your proposal will be written from scratch. We hire top-rated PhD and Master’s writers only to provide students with professional research proposal help at affordable rates. Each customer will get a non-plagiarized paper with timely delivery. Just visit our website and fill in the order form with all proposal details:

Educational advances essays

Educational advances essays Tax supported primary schools were scarce in the early years of the Republic. Aristocrats felt that it was not there concern to educate the lower class. 1. They felt that their children would grow up with "brats." 2. They were afraid that poor children would be armed with votes. Tax-supported public education triumphed between 1825-1850. 1. Laborers demanded instruction for their children. 2. Rising manhood suffrage aided the tax-supported public education. The average schoolhouse was one room, one stove, one teacher, and eight grades. The schools stayed open only a few months of the year. Most school teachers were men who were ill tempered and ill paid. They commonly practiced physical abuse. Horace Mann-a brilliant graduate of Brown University, a Secretary of the Massachusetts board of Education. He campaigned for better schoolhouses longer school terms and higher pay for teachers. 1. His influence moved into other states Education was still expressive and considered a luxury. In 1860, the nation counted 100 high schools, and 1,000,000 illiterate white adults. Black slaves in the south were forbidden to learn reading and writing. Noah Webster improved textbooks (readers), the books also promoted patriotism. Noah Webster was the schoolmaster of the republic. William H. McGuffey- He published grade school readers in the 1830's. He books were knows as "McGuffy's Readers." The Second Great Awakening led to the development of small Liberal Arts colleges in the South and West. 1. The did not provide a good education 2. They were for show, and to make America look better. The first state supported university began in the south, Nort ...

Reasons Why Teens Choose to Have an Abortion

Reasons Why Teens Choose to Have an Abortion Teens facing an unplanned pregnancy choose abortion for similar reasons as women in their twenties and thirties. Teens ask the same questions: Do I want this baby? Can I afford to raise a child? How will this impact my life? Am I ready to be a mother? Coming to a Decision A teen considering abortion is influenced by where she lives, her religious beliefs, her relationship with her parents, access to family planning services, and the behavior of her peer group. Her educational level and socioeconomic status also play a role. According to the Guttmacher Institute, the reasons teens most often give for having an abortion are: Not wanting their lives changed by the birth of a babyNot being able to afford a babyNot feeling mature or responsible enough to raise a child Parental Involvement Whether or not a teen opts for abortion often hinges on a parents knowledge and/or participation in the decision-making. Thirty-four states require some form of parental permission or notification for a minor to obtain an abortion. For teens whose parents are unaware that their daughter is sexually active, this is an additional obstacle that makes a difficult decision even more stressful. The majority of teen abortions involve a parent in some way. 60% of minors who have abortions do so with the knowledge of at least one parent, and a large majority of parents support their daughters choice. Continuing Education...or Not The teen who worries that having a baby will change her life has a good reason for concern. Most teen mothers lives are negatively impacted by the birth of a baby; their educational plans are interrupted, which subsequently limits their future earning potential and puts them at greater risk of raising their child in poverty. In comparison, teens who choose abortion are more successful in school and are more likely to graduate and pursue higher education. They typically come from a higher socioeconomic family background than those who give birth and become teen mothers. Even when socioeconomic factors are taken into consideration, pregnant teens are at a huge educational disadvantage. Teen mothers are significantly less likely to complete high school than their peers; only 40% of young women who give birth before age 18 earn a high school diploma as compared to other young women from similar socioeconomic situations who delay childbearing until age 20 or 21. In the long run, the prospects are even grimmer. Less than 2% of teen mothers who give birth before age 18 go on to earn a college degree by the time they turn 30. Access to Abortion Providers Choice is not a choice when theres little or no access to abortion. For many teens in the U.S., obtaining an abortion involves driving out of town and even sometimes out of state. Limited access shuts the door on abortion for those without transportation or resources. According to the Guttmacher Institute, in 2014 90% of counties in the United States had no abortion provider. Estimates of women who obtained abortions in 2005 indicate that 25% traveled at least 50 miles, and 8% traveled more than 100 miles. Eight states were served by fewer than five abortion providers. North Dakota has only one abortion provider. Even when physical access is not an issue, the parental consent/parental notification laws which exist in 34 states in effect limit access for an underage teen unwilling to discuss the decision with a parent. Teen Pregnancy Before Legalized Abortion The fear and hesitancy teens express at the thought of discussing pregnancy with their parents is deeply rooted in our culture. Past generations regarded teen pregnancy as something deeply shameful. Prior to the legalization of abortion, a pregnant girl or young woman was often sent by her family to a home for unwed mothers, a practice that began in the early 20th century and remained until the 1970s. To maintain the secret, friends, and acquaintances were told that the girl in question was staying with a relative. Teens who were afraid to tell their parents they were pregnant often grew desperate to end their pregnancies. Some attempted self-induced abortions with herbs or toxic substances or sharp implements; others sought out illegal back alley abortionists who were rarely medical professionals. Many girls and young women died as a result of these unsafe abortion methods. Lingering Shame With the legalization of abortion with the Roe v. Wade decision in 1972, safe and legal medical means became available to most of the population, and the procedure could be done discreetly and quietly. Although the shame of teen pregnancy lingered, abortion was a way for a teen or young woman to hide her sexual activity and pregnancy from her parents. High school-aged girls who kept their babies were the subject of gossip and pity among students and parents. Media Depictions of Teen Pregnancy and Abortion Today, those views seem strange and outdated to the many teens who choose to become teen mothers. Mainstream media has come a long way in normalizing the idea of teen pregnancy. Films such as Juno and TV series such as The Secret Life of an American Teen feature pregnant teens as the heroines. Much rarer are depictions of teens choosing abortion- a taboo subject in the eyes of Hollywood. Because teen pregnancy has become almost commonplace in many high schools, the pressure to keep it a secret no longer exists as it did in past generations. More and more teens are choosing to give birth, and a type of reverse pressure now exists, with many teens believing that teen motherhood is a desirable situation. The very public pregnancies of famous teens such as Jamie Lynn Spears and Bristol Palin have added to the glamour of teen pregnancy. Thus for some teens, the decision to have an abortion may be a choice that is criticized by peers who only see the excitement of being pregnant and having a baby. Children of Teen Mothers Teens who choose abortion because they recognize their own immaturity and inability to care for a baby are making a responsible decision; it may not be one that everyone agrees with, but it also cuts short a cycle that is on the rise in the U.S. children giving birth to children. More and more studies indicate that children born to teen mothers begin school with significant disadvantages in learning, do poorer in school and on standardized tests, and are much more likely to drop out of school than the children of women whove delayed childbearing until they reach their twenties. Abortion remains a controversial topic, and a pregnant teen considering abortion often finds herself in the proverbial situation of being between a rock and a hard place. But when finances, life circumstances and rocky personal relationships prevent a teen mother from being able to raise her child in a loving, safe, and stable environment, terminating a pregnancy may be her only viable choice. Sources: In Brief: Facts on American Teens Sexual and Reproductive Health. Guttmacher.org, September 2006.Stanhope, Marcia and Jeanette Lancaster. Foundations of Nursing in the Community: Community-oriented Practice. Elsevier Health Sciences, 2006.Why It Matters: Teen Pregnancy and Education. The National Campaign to Prevent Teen Pregnancy, retrieved 19 May 2009.

Free Trade and its Benefits Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

Free Trade and its Benefits - Essay Example e study of this subject very seriously. According to Lipsey,International Trade is a transaction and trade of goods and services between two individuals living in different countries,two companies operating in different countries and even two governments indulging in some form of trading activity.International trade becomes Free Trade when there are no taxes, quotas and tariffs are levied to these transactions. International trade becomes controlled trade when taxes and quotas are present in the trade activity involving two parties from different countries.There are certain advantages of Free Trade such as efficiency,improved standard of living and foreign earning.The disadvantages of Free Trade are plenty too.These include government revenue loss, deterioration for local industry and outflow of foreign reserves.It is widely believed that free trade leads to efficiency.This can be explained by a diagram,but we must keep in mind that opposite of free trade is one where the host govern ment charges either tariffs or quotas on imported goods. In the above diagram, it can be seen that free trade is more meritorious to a situation where either no international trade is taking place or where the trade is not free. At first there is no free trade. The market is work at a point where D=S or where demand is equated to supply. The equilibrium quantity of goods traded at this point is represented by â€Å"Y†. If the country decided to indulge in free trade then SW will become the supply curve and fewer goods will be traded in the market at point â€Å"Y1†. The reason why the quantity of goods traded in the market is reduced is because the imported goods are cheaper and local production of goods has reduced and the gap between Y-Y1 is filled by imported goods. This is a point of controversy and economists who are against Free Trade argue that free trade will lead to closure and downsizing of local businesses resulting in massive unemployment in the country. Un der these circumstances Free Trade looks like an evil and it looks a valid claim that imported goods should be stopped from penetrating the local markets. However, the supporters of Free Trade claim that it leads to better utilization of world’s scarce resources. They use the theories of absolute and comparative advantage to justify their claim and recommends that the country should divert from production of goods in which it does not have an absolute and comparative advantage to the good where these advantages can be exploited. However, many countries choose a different route and exploit the benefits of allocative efficiency. They charge some sort of taxes to imported goods or give subsidies to local industries to make sure that local production remains high and local industries are able to compete with the imported goods. This leads to partial improvement in local industries situation, but at the expense of efficiency. Hence, one can see that any trade that is taxed or rest ricted cannot yield same amount of efficiency as uncontrolled trade. Free Trade also renders certain other advantages too. It leads to an increase in choices that people can make. This is a necessary condition for improvement in living standard of people. Hence, Free Trade allows people to live a better life. Free Trade

Other than brutal conquest, what impact did the Mongol empire have on Essay

Other than brutal conquest, what impact did the Mongol empire have on the known world and why - Essay Example ined and the strongest armies and with a highly organizational and strategic mind of a leader, the Mongolians were able to succeed in their brutal conquest for expansion and increase in territory. Apart from achieving victory in stretching the empire through invasion and conquest, the Mongols also achieved great success in other things. One of the greatest impacts that is still evident up to this day is its effect on the human as well as the political geography of Asia. Because of the emergence of the Mongol Empire, the great collection of several Semi-Turkic and Mongolic tribes were unified under the reign and rule of the founder of the Mongol Empire, Genghis Kan. Moreover, the existence of the states that came out from the dust of the collapse of the Mongol Empire owed their existence to the Mongols. The large size of the Mongol Empire due to its great expansion and conquest from Asia reaching all the way to Eastern Europe has brought about and encouraged wider distribution and trading of a mixture of different goods and other products, and along with it also helped spread out and share knowledge and understanding of various topics and subject matter in several fields of astronomy, science, mathematics and also in other fields such as art, theatre and others. The founder and first leader of the Mongol Empire and known as one of the world’s greatest conquerors throughout history, Genghis Khan, brought the kingdom to become known throughout the world. Through him, the empire saw success and rose to power. Although Khan himself was illiterate, he ordered and introduced a writing system, which still kept on and remained in modern Mongolia up until the twentieth century. Furthermore, Genghis Khan also brought in the thought and initiative of religious tolerance all over the empire. The fifth leader of the Mongol Empire and the grandson of Genghis Khan, Kublai Khan, continued to build on and develop the empire’s success. During his reign, he was also able to